WAVV
Requirement Form
Date: 5/1/2003 Requirement #: WAVV200401
Title: (Paraphrase problem in a
single statement)Allow missing values in
DISP= of DLBL stmt
Detailed
Problem Description: (Description of what you want changed - 400 character entry limit)
By requiring values witin
the DISP= keyword makes PROCs more complicated
Example: AFILE PROC
// PROC DDNAME=AFILE,DISP1='',DISP2='',DISP3=''
// DLBL
&DDNAME,'A.FILE',,VSAM,CAT=ACAT,DISP=(DISP1,DISP2,DISP3)
This will cause problems if DISP3 is not specified or if both DISP2 and DISP3
is not specified or if none of the DISPn keywords are specified. This makes the logic more complicated
Priority: (Select one: Urgent
- High - Medium - Low)
Medium
Requested
Completion Date: (When? Examples: 3 months, 1 year,
Next Release) 1 year
Requirement
Type: (Select one:
Acceptability - Compatibility/Migration - Ease of Use - Feature/Function - Performance - Reliability/Availability/Serviceability
- Packaging - Interoperability)
Ease of Use
Business
Justification: (Why? Non-technical
business case description. Do not reword Detailed Problem
Description from above. What are the benefits to be gained by your
company, and the vendor and others?
Quantify: run time, dollars, manpower, etc. Why should the vendor do this for the customer?)
Simplifying PROC implementation for all files
Solution: (Optional)(Desired/undesired elements Note: Making a suggestion may limit a
vendors ability to deliver a solution)
Allow specification of DISP=(value1,,),
DISP=(,value2,) and DISP=(value1,value2,)
Impact: (Optional) (How
will your company’s business be affected if a solution is not delivered?)
Company Name: RCSI
Author Name: Frank
M. Ramaekers Jr. Author
Title:
Author
Address: 3900 Lima St.
Author E-mail: fmramaekers@RedmanConsulting.com
Telephone:
(303) 375-2471